
Within this post I will discuss Depth of Field (DOF). The use of DOF, how to control it and its application. There will also be a small insight into vignetting. After a brief introduction of the model.
Drum roll please…
Making his debut (again) on the Twisted Indifference Studios Blog, the furry nemesis of pillows, couches and car seats, the master of the ‘puppy dog looks’, my best friend and favourite model;
Edison.
Readers who read the posts on this blog before my MySql database decided to vanish suddenly might remember the photo below.

Edison turned 6 in January. In dog years that makes him 42. That, as everyone who have read the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams would know is the answer to Life, The Universe and Everything Else. If you haven’t read the book, I suggest you stop reading this and go buy the book first. A lot of websites that I referenced disagree with the 1 human year = 7 in dog years conversion but then these are the people who still think that digital watches are a good idea. Trust me you will love the book. Incidentally six years ago, on February 17 was when Edison first stepped into my house as a month and half year old puppy.
Moving on to the actual purpose of this post. First up, the opening photo.
Source of light: The setting Sun.
Location: Hills behind the ILS Law College in Pune, India.
The first aspect you need to notice is the ‘bokeh’ or background blur. Out of focus backgrounds are generally used in photography to minimize the emphasis of the background so that eye is immediately drawn to the actual subject of the photograph. This is seen often in Portrait Photography and Macro Photography. Usually while shooting landscapes the objective is to ensure that the sharpness extends to the background as well.
This is what depth of field (DOF) is all about. DOF is controlled mainly by the aperture. The other aspects that affect DOF are focal length of the lens and the distance of the subject. Larger the opening of the aperture (smaller f stop), shallower the depth of field. Smaller the opening of the aperture (larger f stop), sharper the depth of field.

If you take the photo with Edison and the Coffee Mug, you will notice a much shallower depth of field. The lenses used in both cases were different. In the opening photo I used the Nikkor 18mm - 200mm. The maximum opening of the aperture at 18mm is f/3.5. This photo was taken at 60mm and the aperture was stopped down to f/5. In the second image, I used my Nikkor 50mm Prime Lens. Primes are the babes of the optical world. 50mm is a fixed focal length but the aperture opens up all the way up to f/1.4. These lenses are also called fast lenses. They will give you high shutter speeds even in low light conditions.
Another aspect to note on the opening photograph is the liberal use of vignetting. Vignetting happens on most lenses as the light entering from the peripheral edges of the lenses hit smaller lens openings as compared to the light that is incident on the center. In the opening photograph I forced vignetting in post processing. The result as you can see is a hot spot in the center, making it look like a spotlight on the subject, in this case my dog.
Take a look at the images up in this post. Clicking on it will take you to my Flickr page. I want to get rid of some of the bugs in Lightbox before I switch to it again.
To Summarize:
-

The opening shot has a relatively sharper DOF than the rest on account of a wider focal length.
-

The second shot has maximum bokeh (as opposed to the other photos in this post) as it was shot at f/1.4 with the focal length of the lens being 75mm (50mm with the 1.5x crop factor of the Nikon D200).
-
In the third image, while the aperture has been stopped down to f/5.3, the focal length (90mm) and my distance from the subject contributed to the shallow depth of field. That is of course not to say that f/5.3 would have given crystal clear backgrounds under different circumstances. Though I do not like reducing choices, certain limitations of the camera and the lens do exist and so when you are talking clarity in photos where a clear depth of field is that important higher aperture levels are very much necessary.
I hope this post about Depth of Field was helpful. If you have any doubts, questions, you are more than welcome to post them in the comments. In the next post I will be using another photograph of Edison to talk briefly about shooting and processing RAW files. Make sure you check back, or even better,
Subscribe